Skip to content
Maison BeaulieuMAISON BEAULIEUAB ÉDITIONS · GASTRONOMY & HISTORICAL ARCHIVES
Justice & Scandals · England

The Horse Sold at Smithfield

The son of a baronet, bred at Eton, turns counterfeit heir, sharper, and highwayman. Having returned from the American colonies after a sentence of transportation, William Parsons is recognized near Hounslow by a man who had already pursued him for fraud. The illustrious name he invokes cannot save him from the gallows at Tyburn, in February 1751.

Upon Hounslow Heath, two travellers seated in a chaise were stripped of five guineas, eight shillings, and a watch. The mounted highwayman who brought them to a stand vanished with his booty, which he pledged the following morning for a pound and a half. Thus the timepiece passed from a gentleman’s pocket to a pawnbroker’s counter; the man who parted with it had already crossed the Atlantic and assumed another name to resume living at the expense of others, according to the career chronicled by Borrow.

The son of a baronet, born in London in 1717 and bred at Eton, Parsons was first sent out as a midshipman aboard the Drake, bound for Jamaica. A period of shore leave allowed him to renew his addresses to the daughter of a physician at Bishop’s Waltham, whom he resolved to marry in order to lay hands upon her estate. His uncle packed him back off to sea, first to Jamaica, then to Newfoundland. Later, Parsons entered the service of the Royal African Company upon the Gambia, but fell out with the governor and returned to England. This succession of departures brought him neither wealth nor independence; it served only to breed fresh expectations toward the kinsmen he had already disappointed.

While dwelling beneath his uncle’s roof, he got a servant-maid with child and was turned out of doors. He drifted as far as London with three halfpence to subsist on for four days. A coachman permitted him to sleep in a hayloft; an old acquaintance procured him a lodging and food. His father subsequently consented to see him again, yet bestowed upon him no more than five shillings. Parsons then learned that an aunt had bequeathed a sum of money to his brother. He immediately raised loans upon the promise of this legacy, passing it off as his own.

His family thereafter secured him an ensign’s commission in Cholmondeley’s regiment. He married a young gentlewoman whose father had lately died, and whose fortune restored him to easy circumstances. The pair took fine houses, maintaining coach, horses, and liveried servants far beyond their means. It was then that he fell in with one Doctor N., a gamester and familiar of the gaming-houses, who won his confidence and drew him into his play. Debts mounted swiftly; before long, his extravagant establishment and his creditors pressed upon him more heavily than his new military station could sustain.

Sent with his regiment to Flanders, Parsons continued to raise monies by way of annuities and mortgages. Pressed by military creditors, he sold his commission to satisfy their demands. Doctor N. accompanied him back to England. Pursued by debt, Parsons was unable to live with his wife; he took a chamber in Gough Square under the style of Captain Brown, giving himself out to be an unmarried man. He courted his landlord’s daughter, abandoned her, and the young woman was subsequently cast into Newgate for debt. The chronicle presents this episode as the hour in which his frauds began to fall directly upon those who had sought to succour him.

He went so far as to contrive a sham marriage ceremony to plunder a jeweller. In a tavern, he bespake a parson and demanded both plain gold hoops and diamond rings, intended, he declared, for his bride-to-be. When the goldsmith produced the jewels, Parsons drew forth a bill and demanded change. At the very last moment, he announced that he would settle the reckoning after the ceremony. The woman left the chamber upon the pretext of a sudden indisposition; Parsons stepped out in his turn, leaving his hat behind to avert suspicion, and vanished with his accomplice. The clergyman and the jeweller were left alone to pay the score he had run up.

The sea once more appeared to offer him a fresh start. In 1745, he took ship as captain of marines aboard a privateer. After a French prize had been carried into Cork, he fell sick and was left ashore when the vessel put out again. Being destitute of funds, he drew bills of exchange upon London merchants. He then quitted Ireland aboard a captured French craft, reached Plymouth, and made his way back to London. The promised payments were never met; Parsons’s returns seemed to keep pace with the ships he could board and the credits he could open.

He was presently apprehended for a fraud and sentenced to transportation. The narrative relates that after seven months’ confinement, he was transported to Maryland, landing at Annapolis on the 30th of November 1749. Borrow describes him as living as a “common slave” for some seven weeks following his transportation; the chronicle does not specify the indenture or legal condition under which he was sold in Virginia. A gentleman of rank, moved by his plight, received him into his house; Parsons presently rode off upon his benefactor’s horse. Upon the highway, he first robbed a horseman, and next a woman and her companion travelling in a chaise. He then crossed the Potomac, sold his horse, and took ship for England.

At Whitehaven, his return furnished him with another opening. He forged a letter announcing his father’s demise and claimed he had come to take possession of a great estate. A merchant advanced him seventy pounds upon a bill drawn on a London banker. Parsons squandered the money on fine clothes and in the haunts he had frequented before his exile. When his funds ran low, he turned from fraudulent paper to pistols and the open road.

Borrow next places a robbery upon Hounslow Heath under the date of August 1748. This mark in time accords ill with the chronicle that had just seen Parsons sentenced to transportation, transported to Maryland in November 1749, and thence brought back to Whitehaven. The text offers no explanation for this reversal and affords no means of correcting it without recourse to other records. The stolen watch was pawned the very next morning; later, Fuller, who had formerly prosecuted Parsons, recognized him upon the road in company with Best.

Fuller and Best bid him keep his distance; Parsons nonetheless persisted in dogging them as far as Hounslow, where a third horseman joined their company. The two gentlemen alighted from their chaise, demanded that he surrender or be taken, and conveyed him into a room at the inn. Parsons surrendered his loaded pistols to them. The landlord, who kept the Rose and Crown, recognized in him the description of a highwayman cried upon the road. A constable searched his pockets and drew forth a powder-horn and leaden balls. The text does not state that Fuller and Best were the victims of the chaise robbery: Fuller is expressly set down as Parsons’s former prosecutor in an affair of fraud.

Brought before the justice, Parsons pleaded the respectability of his house and sued for mercy. He was committed to Newgate. Borrow relates that he clung to the hope of a reprieve until the very last hour. The title of a contemporary tract preserved at the Huntington Library clarifies what this compilation leaves in shadow: Parsons was executed at Tyburn on the 11th of February 1751 for returning from transportation. His return to England, after so many departures hailed as new beginnings, proved the cause of his undoing. At the inn, he had yielded his loaded pistols to the two men who had known him again; before the magistrate, he had nothing left to produce but his family’s name.

From this true case a future book could be born

Help us choose our next book

You have just read the complete account of this historical case. It inspires three original fiction projects yet to be written. Which one would you like to see published? Your vote guides AB Éditions.

novella

The False Heir’s Coin

An entirely fictional novella following a Whitehaven clerk who advances money to a traveller on the faith of a letter announcing his father’s death. When the banker refuses the draft, the clerk discovers he has furnished a sharper with the means to take to the road again. To recover his sister’s savings, he must track the man down before the debt ruins their shop. The lender wavers between public disgrace and denunciation. If this moral dilemma entices you, cast your vote for this novella.

Loading votes…

novel

The Names of Brown

An entirely fictional novel recounting the return of an escaped convict who conceals himself behind divers identities. An innkeeper gives him shelter, an ostler sells his horse, and a young widow believes she recognizes in him her long-lost brother. Each witness holds a fragment of his trail, yet none can tell why he ever returns to the very same crossroads. When a robbery upon the highway raises the hue and cry, the characters must decide whom to shield and which name to enter into the parish register. If this historical inquiry draws you, cast your vote for this novel.

Loading votes…

trilogy

The Impossible Returns

This fictional trilogy follows three souls returned from forced banishment into a country they no longer recognize. In each volume, an ancient debt compels them to borrow an alias and throw themselves upon the mercy of strangers. A family of innkeepers preserves the letters left behind at each passing; the daughter discovers that one of these epistles foretells a crime before it is committed, and sets about investigating in secret. The affairs and characters are wholly invented. If this saga of broken faith and precarious return appeals to you, cast your vote for this trilogy.

Loading votes…

One choice per case on this browser, editable at any time. The most supported projects will inspire our upcoming publications. How your votes are kept.

Explore all literary projects →
Historical sources and our share of literary reconstruction

Borrow places the Hounslow robbery in August 1748, following a landing in Maryland dated November 1749; this chronological discrepancy has been left standing without conjectural amendment. As to the execution, the present narrative retains the date of 11 February 1751 and the indictment for returning from transportation, both attested by the title of the contemporary pamphlet catalogued at the Huntington Library. Only the bibliographical notice of this printed work was consulted. Borrow’s account supplies the biographical vignettes; it does not furnish the detailed proceedings of the final trial.

← All 1,003 cases of the Cabinet