Skip to content
Maison BeaulieuMAISON BEAULIEUAB ÉDITIONS · GASTRONOMY & HISTORICAL ARCHIVES
Justice & Scandals · England

Battine’s Letter

In 1748–49, Daniel Chater and William Galley journeyed toward Chichester to identify a suspect in the plunder of the Poole Custom House. Smugglers intercepted their mission, abducted them, and put them to death; Benjamin Tapner and other members of the gang stood trial before a Special Commission in January 1748–49.

The letter was addressed to Mr. Battine, the Surveyor of Customs at Chichester. When William Galley drew it from his pocket within an inn at Leigh, a company of smugglers caught sight of the name upon the cover. Daniel Chater was travelling in his company; both men had left the coast to identify a prisoner detained in the wake of the robbery at the Poole Custom House. The strangers told them they had mistaken their way and offered to serve as guides. In truth, they had just perceived that these travellers were riding to bear witness against one of their own.

Ever since the plundering of the Poole warehouse in 1747, the revenue officers had been searching for those who carried off the seized goods. A man referred to as Dimar in the chronicle, arrested and held at Chichester, had recently been singled out as a suspect. Chater knew him and possessed knowledge of the burglary. The authorities requested that he accompany Galley, an officer of the customs, that he might formally identify Dimar before the magistrates conducting the inquiry. Their journey toward Chichester was intended as a routine appearance of witnesses; it proved instead to be the march that delivered them into the hands of the gang.

Having accepted the proffered escort at Leigh, the travellers halted at the house of a widow named Payne, whose sons were known to consort with the smugglers. Mrs. Payne suspected the two strangers of being revenue officers, and her sons went abroad to summon their confederates. In the meantime, Chater and Galley drank heavily. The record relates that they spoke far too freely of their errand and their connections. When they were roused that evening, the smugglers were in full possession of their secret.

When the hour came to depart, William Jackson commanded them to rise and quit the house. The company set out on horseback. Some among them debated keeping the two men captive and transporting them across the Channel to France; others opposed the design. Ere long, the gang fell upon the travellers with their whips. The beatings continued over several stretches of the road, until the wretched men could no longer keep their saddles. Their legs were then lashed beneath the horses’ bellies to prevent their falling; yet their bodies slipped down nonetheless, until their heads dragged heavily along the ground.

At Lady Holt Park, the smugglers cut Galley loose. According to the deposition recorded by Borrow, they debated whether to cast him down a well. Certain voices protested, and he was lifted back onto a horse. He was no longer capable of sitting upright; they laid him across the saddle, then forced his legs around the pommel, his torso dangling over the neck of the beast. He begged that they would kill him outright rather than leave him to linger in agony. None granted his prayer. While one of the smugglers mounted behind to steady him, Galley fell down a steep descent and died upon the spot, as the account relates.

The men carried his corpse to the house of a confederate and inquired how it might best be concealed. Another smuggler advised them to dig a trench in a solitary place. They laid Galley in a shallow grave. Seven months later, a huntsman chanced upon the spot. Galley’s coat, boots, and official commission were recovered from one of his pockets. These effects restored to light what the murderers had sought to obliterate: the man was indeed an officer of the customs, sent to aid the inquiry into the Poole outrage.

Chater had not died with his companion. The gang carried him to the house of old Mills, another confederate, and chained him to a post in a turf-shed, where he remained for three days. Benjamin Tapner drew a knife and slashed his forehead and across both his eyes. He bade him fall to his prayers, warning him that the men who had come to kill him would not depart until the deed was done. Not one among them intervened.

They subsequently conducted Chater on horseback toward the well at Lady Holt. Tapner placed a halter about his neck. Seeing a gap in the pale, the captive attempted to squeeze through; Tapner compelled him to vault the fence. The men suspended him over the mouth of the well and left him dangling there for a quarter of an hour. One of them seized his legs; Tapner loosened the rope, and the body plunged to the bottom. When one of the smugglers declared he believed he still heard the wretch breathing, they cast heavy fence-rails and gate-posts into the pit before riding away.

On their journey homeward, the men halted to drink at the house of an acquaintance. Borrow records that they spoke of the deed as though it were a notable exploit. Yet the disappearance of the two travellers provoked a protracted and painstaking search. Members of the band were taken into custody, and several consented to turn King’s evidence against their fellows. The prosecution did not rest merely upon the exhumation of Galley’s remains; it gathered the corroborating testimonies of those who had ridden with the gang and participated in the outrages.

A Special Commission convened at Chichester on 16 January 1749. Benjamin Tapner, John Cobby, and John Hammond stood indicted as principals in the murder of Chater; William Carter, the elder and younger Richard Mills, and William Jackson were arraigned as accessories before the fact. Jackson and Carter were likewise indicted for the murder of Galley. The bills of indictment thus distinguished between the two deaths and the specific role attributed to each prisoner in their execution. The proceedings opened before a jury that heard the recital of the torments, the description of the places of confinement, and the depositions of former accomplices. The jury retired for scarce a quarter of an hour before returning a verdict of guilty against all the prisoners, according to the chronicle.

The presiding judge ordered their execution for the following day. Borrow fixes 18 January 1749 as the date of the hanging of six of the condemned; Jackson had died in prison on the evening of his conviction. The bodies of Carter, Tapner, Cobby, and Hammond were subsequently hung in chains: Carter near Rake, Tapner upon Rook’s Hill, and the remaining two upon the coast near Selsey Bill. High upon the littoral, their gibbets stood as a landmark seen from afar, both to the east and to the west.

In Jackson’s pocket was discovered a small religious charm. It invoked the Three Kings of Cologne and implored their intercession at the hour of death. A French inscription attested that the paper had touched their sacred relics in Cologne, serving to preserve travellers from misfortunes of the road, fevers, and sudden death. Borrow employs this relic to comment upon the condemned man’s faith; the scrap of paper proves nothing regarding his guilt in the murders. Yet it endures among the material relics preserved in the annals of that fatal road: the letter that betrayed Galley’s errand, the commission disinterred from the earth, and this talisman promising safety to a man condemned for riding with that murderous company.

From this true case a future book could be born

Help us choose our next book

You have just read the complete account of this historical case. It inspires three original fiction projects yet to be written. Which one would you like to see published? Your vote guides AB Éditions.

novella

The Innkeeper’s Daughter

A fictional young woman assisting her mother in an alehouse overhears two travellers speak of an official letter moments before the smugglers bar the shutters. Realising her brothers have cast their lot with the gang, she cannot tell whether they mean to detain the men, betray them, or take their lives. Once a horse is saddled in the yard, she must decide whether to slip away into the dark and warn the excise. This tale imagines the domestic dilemmas of that hearth without claiming the daughter ever walked the earth. Choose the Novella for a tense night where a single overheard phrase forces an irrevocable choice.

Loading votes…

novel

The Chichester Road

A fictional young ostler is hired to guide two horsemen toward Chichester, unaware of why they must never reach their destination. Observing the riders, the wayside post-houses, and the heavy silences along the road, he is torn between dread of the gang and the impulse to protect a helpless witness. The novel charts a year across a region where contraband sustains whole villages and draws down the wrath of the revenue. The personal portraits and domestic encounters are wholly invented. Choose the Novel for an expansive study of complicity, fear, and moral reckoning.

Loading votes…

trilogy

Coast and Highway

Three fictional narratives follow a merchant woman who inherits a coastal warehouse facing the customs post, a Sussex boatman tasked with ferrying an accused smuggler to the assizes, and a widow struggling to rear her children between the fishery and the illicit trade. The cycle does not dramatise the historical witnesses of the Chater-Galley tragedy, drawing solely upon the maritime borderland of shoreline, highway, and assize court. Each volume lends a voice to those who endured the dominion of armed gangs. Choose the Trilogy to explore a whole generation caught along the Sussex littoral.

Loading votes…

One choice per case on this browser, editable at any time. The most supported projects will inspire our upcoming publications. How your votes are kept.

Explore all literary projects →
Historical sources and our share of literary reconstruction

Borrow’s transcriptions and chronology exhibit minor discrepancies: Chater and Galley are said to have set out on 14 February 1748, while a subsequent passage dates the encounter to 13 February; the Special Commission is dated in the old style as 1748–9. The contemporary trial pamphlet preserved in the Folger and Wellcome collections records the Chichester commission from 16 to 18 January 1748–9; mid-February 1748–49 serves as the internal timeline, with 1749 adopted as the editorial reference year. Borrow presents the two killings in distinct episodes—Galley perishing first, and Chater three days later—and assigns precise roles to the accused. The chronicle records the guilty verdict against all defendants, and the text adheres strictly to these reported judicial findings without imputing further personal guilt. The bodies were hung in chains upon gibbets, the sentence being an act of judicial retribution distinct from mob violence. Jackson expired in prison on the evening of his conviction, prior to the hanging of the six others on 18 January 1749. The narrative preserves the spelling “Dimar” without interpolating the unverified alias “Diamond.” The paper charm discovered upon Jackson is treated as an archival curiosity rather than an instrument of legal proof.

← All 1,003 cases of the Cabinet